Tilli for Schools: Stakeholder Mapping
Revised: Apr 1, 2025
I. Key Stakeholders
Students
- Description: The primary beneficiaries of the Tilli for Schools platform. They are the ones who will be assessed and receive personalized learning.
- Their Goals:
- Engaging and effective learning experiences
- Personalized learning that meets their individual needs
- Feeling supported and understood in their learning journey
- Influence: High – Based on feedback, engagement, and growth
- Engagement Strategy:
- Design a user-friendly, engaging platform
- Solicit student feedback via teachers
Teachers
- Description: Key users of the Tilli for Schools platform
- Their Goals:
- Effective tools for assessing and supporting students' social-emotional learning
- Access to data-driven insights to inform teaching
- Time-saving solutions for administrative tasks
- Influence: High – Their usage is critical to success
- Engagement Strategy:
- Provide training and ongoing support
- Involve in platform design and development
- Collect feedback on features and functionality
Parents
- Description: Provide insights into their children’s skills
- Interests:
- Supportive educational tools
- Helping schools meet children's educational needs
- Influence: High – Their feedback is essential
- Engagement Strategy:
- Clearly communicate the purpose and benefits of Tilli for Schools
- Involve them to foster open communication
School Administrators (Principals, District Leaders)
- Description: Decision-makers for platform adoption
- Interests:
- Improving student outcomes
- Meeting school or district goals
- Effective resource use
- Influence: Very High – Necessary for implementation
- Engagement Strategy:
- Present supportive data and research
- Align platform benefits with educational goals
Stanford (Research Partner)
- Description: University partner providing research and analysis
- Interests:
- Access to quality data
- Publication and dissemination of findings
- Influence: Moderate – Informs development and validation
- Engagement Strategy:
- Share anonymized, aggregated data
Open Source Contributors
- Description: Individuals/organizations contributing to the project
- Interests:
- Meaningful project involvement
- Recognition and collaboration
- Open-source advocacy
- Influence: Moderate to High – Enhance platform quality
- Engagement Strategy:
- Provide clear contribution guidelines and documentation
- Actively encourage contributions and recognize efforts
- Build a welcoming community and integrate feedback
Open Source Community Users
- Description: Users of the Tilli for Schools codebase
- Interests:
- Free, quality tools for education
- Customization options
- Access to support resources
- Influence: Moderate – Their adoption increases reach
- Engagement Strategy:
- Offer tutorials and clear documentation
- Provide support through community channels
- Encourage sharing of custom adaptations
Digital Public Goods Alliance (DPG)
- Description: Promotes open source and community-based digital tools
- Interests:
- Ensuring open-source best practices
- Strengthening the community
- Influence: High – DPG compliance required by UNICEF
- Engagement Strategy:
- Meet DPG compliance and funding requirements
II. Stakeholder Analysis Matrix
Stakeholder | Interest | Influence | Engagement Strategy |
---|---|---|---|
Students | Effective learning, personalized support | High | User-friendly design, gather feedback |
Teachers | Effective tools, data-driven insights, time savings | High | Training and support, involve in design, gather feedback |
Parents | Supportive tool, children's skill growth | High | Clear communication, involve in process, address concerns |
School Administrators | Improved outcomes, goal alignment, resource use | Very High | Data-driven presentations, align with goals |
UNICEF | Project success, impact on children | Very High | Regular communication, involve in decisions, adhere to reporting requirements |
Stanford | Quality data for research | Moderate | Provide access to anonymized data, collaborate on research |
Open Source Contributors | Meaningful contributions, recognition, collaboration | Moderate | Clear guidelines, solicit contributions, acknowledge contributors, foster community |
Open Source Users | Access to high-quality tools, customization, support | Moderate | Clear documentation, offer support channels, encourage sharing of customizations |
DPG Alliance | Ensuring open source practices | High | Comply to the fund's requirements |