Skip to main content

Tilli for Schools: Stakeholder Mapping

Revised: Apr 1, 2025


I. Key Stakeholders

Students

  • Description: The primary beneficiaries of the Tilli for Schools platform. They are the ones who will be assessed and receive personalized learning.
  • Their Goals:
    • Engaging and effective learning experiences
    • Personalized learning that meets their individual needs
    • Feeling supported and understood in their learning journey
  • Influence: High – Based on feedback, engagement, and growth
  • Engagement Strategy:
    • Design a user-friendly, engaging platform
    • Solicit student feedback via teachers

Teachers

  • Description: Key users of the Tilli for Schools platform
  • Their Goals:
    • Effective tools for assessing and supporting students' social-emotional learning
    • Access to data-driven insights to inform teaching
    • Time-saving solutions for administrative tasks
  • Influence: High – Their usage is critical to success
  • Engagement Strategy:
    • Provide training and ongoing support
    • Involve in platform design and development
    • Collect feedback on features and functionality

Parents

  • Description: Provide insights into their children’s skills
  • Interests:
    • Supportive educational tools
    • Helping schools meet children's educational needs
  • Influence: High – Their feedback is essential
  • Engagement Strategy:
    • Clearly communicate the purpose and benefits of Tilli for Schools
    • Involve them to foster open communication

School Administrators (Principals, District Leaders)

  • Description: Decision-makers for platform adoption
  • Interests:
    • Improving student outcomes
    • Meeting school or district goals
    • Effective resource use
  • Influence: Very High – Necessary for implementation
  • Engagement Strategy:
    • Present supportive data and research
    • Align platform benefits with educational goals

Stanford (Research Partner)

  • Description: University partner providing research and analysis
  • Interests:
    • Access to quality data
    • Publication and dissemination of findings
  • Influence: Moderate – Informs development and validation
  • Engagement Strategy:
    • Share anonymized, aggregated data

Open Source Contributors

  • Description: Individuals/organizations contributing to the project
  • Interests:
    • Meaningful project involvement
    • Recognition and collaboration
    • Open-source advocacy
  • Influence: Moderate to High – Enhance platform quality
  • Engagement Strategy:
    • Provide clear contribution guidelines and documentation
    • Actively encourage contributions and recognize efforts
    • Build a welcoming community and integrate feedback

Open Source Community Users

  • Description: Users of the Tilli for Schools codebase
  • Interests:
    • Free, quality tools for education
    • Customization options
    • Access to support resources
  • Influence: Moderate – Their adoption increases reach
  • Engagement Strategy:
    • Offer tutorials and clear documentation
    • Provide support through community channels
    • Encourage sharing of custom adaptations

Digital Public Goods Alliance (DPG)

  • Description: Promotes open source and community-based digital tools
  • Interests:
    • Ensuring open-source best practices
    • Strengthening the community
  • Influence: High – DPG compliance required by UNICEF
  • Engagement Strategy:
    • Meet DPG compliance and funding requirements

II. Stakeholder Analysis Matrix

StakeholderInterestInfluenceEngagement Strategy
StudentsEffective learning, personalized supportHighUser-friendly design, gather feedback
TeachersEffective tools, data-driven insights, time savingsHighTraining and support, involve in design, gather feedback
ParentsSupportive tool, children's skill growthHighClear communication, involve in process, address concerns
School AdministratorsImproved outcomes, goal alignment, resource useVery HighData-driven presentations, align with goals
UNICEFProject success, impact on childrenVery HighRegular communication, involve in decisions, adhere to reporting requirements
StanfordQuality data for researchModerateProvide access to anonymized data, collaborate on research
Open Source ContributorsMeaningful contributions, recognition, collaborationModerateClear guidelines, solicit contributions, acknowledge contributors, foster community
Open Source UsersAccess to high-quality tools, customization, supportModerateClear documentation, offer support channels, encourage sharing of customizations
DPG AllianceEnsuring open source practicesHighComply to the fund's requirements